There is very little difference to me .
All from the 10 to the 18 (which I use daily) minimal updates as the years have passed.
Yes you could turn round and say that the 18 is far superior in every way mmm!!!??? Not really its been a learning curve the main difference to me is hose over the shoulder and band clips so the hood does not fall off.
In fact the 10 probably has a superior mask build (lay up) due to fibre glass was a new thing at the time so twice as much was used .
You turn up with a 10 today.
Is it in test yes you happy with it yes
Then lets go to work.
But if your super is 25yrs old then maybe that could be a NO
thanks lizz are you referring to the 10 specifically or bandmasks in general because i am very familiar with using the 18 and 28 im just not sure about the older models
Kirby Morgan BandMask 8. This was the first of our masks to sell on a large scale. It had several improvements over the 7, primarily the provision for attaching a bail out bottle for emergency breathing gas supply. This mask was manufactured in 1967 through 1969.
Jack Brown-Help ! I use to sell KMB-10's for $525 back in the early/mid 70's but got tired of having to buy top bands and the parts needed just seemed to go on forever like hoods, spider bands, etc. a handy mask but hats are better so I bought my first Miller 100 just a strait air hat better coms and dry ears ending ear infections. The KMB-10 was a pretty good mask but the jaw fatigue -wow.
yes been there one time only thankfully ouch felt as if i had been punched on the jaw.
but if you slack the band off as per instructions i.e. at the jaw what a difference ok i spend maybe 2 3hrs in it not all day.